ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) covers 37.3% of CMMC 2.0
41 of the 110 controls in CMMC 2.0 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0). 69 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
What this leaves you to do
CMMC 2.0 has 110 controls. Holding ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) already evidences 41 of them, so the work in front of you is 69 controls, not 110, which is 63% of the standard rather than all of it.
That is the whole claim. We do not know your hourly rate, how long a control takes you, or how many people you have, so there is no figure here in dollars or weeks. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.
This number is directional. It says how much of CMMC 2.0 your ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
85 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Rights on sensitive resources are granted only to those who require them.
Each person accessing the system holds a nominative account.
The network connection of devices used away from the premises is secured.
Strong authentication is required for access from outside the entity.
Traffic from remote workstations is protected on untrusted networks.
Sensitive data crossing the internet is encrypted to published recommendations.
Wi-Fi access networks are secured and their uses separated.
Wi-Fi is secured so guest and internal access are not open or shared.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk