ACSC Essential EightSOC 2

ACSC Essential Eight covers 18% of SOC 2

11 of the 61 controls in SOC 2 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ACSC Essential Eight. 50 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

18%
of the target already covered
11
controls evidenced
50
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

What this leaves you to do

SOC 2 has 61 controls. Holding ACSC Essential Eight already evidences 11 of them, so the work in front of you is 50 controls, not 61, which is 82% of the standard rather than all of it.

That is the whole claim. We do not know your hourly rate, how long a control takes you, or how many people you have, so there is no figure here in dollars or weeks. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.

This number is directional. It says how much of SOC 2 your ACSC Essential Eight evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

31 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

A - Availability2 of 3 evidenced, 1 to do
CC - Common Criteria (Security)9 of 33 evidenced, 24 to do
C - Confidentiality0 of 2 evidenced, 2 to do
P - Privacy0 of 18 evidenced, 18 to do
PI - Processing Integrity0 of 5 evidenced, 5 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

E8-BACKUP-ML3SOC2-A1.2argued against and upheld
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

Backup administrators cannot modify or delete backups during the retention period.

E8-BACKUP-ML1SOC2-A1.2argued against and upheld
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

Backups of data, applications and settings are performed, synchronised and retained securely.

E8-BACKUP-ML1SOC2-A1.3argued against and upheld
Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures

Restoration from backups is tested as part of disaster recovery exercises.

E8-MFA-ML3SOC2-CC6.1argued against and upheld
Implements logical access security software, infrastructure and architectures over protected information assets

Phishing resistant multi factor authentication is required for all users of the system.

E8-ADMIN-ML1SOC2-CC6.1argued against and upheld
Implements logical access security software, infrastructure and architectures over protected information assets

Privileged access runs through dedicated accounts and separated privileged operating environments.

E8-ADMIN-ML3SOC2-CC6.3argued against and upheld
Role-based access and least privilege are enforced

Access for users and services is limited to only what their assigned duties require.

E8-ADMIN-ML2SOC2-CC6.3argued against and upheld
Role-based access and least privilege are enforced

Access is revalidated at 12 months and removed after 45 days of inactivity.

E8-MFA-ML1SOC2-CC6.6argued against and upheld
Measures against threats outside system boundaries are implemented

Multi factor authentication is required on internet facing, customer facing and third party services.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk