Where a public entity can demonstrate that complying with 35.200 would fundamentally alter a service, program or activity or impose undue financial and administrative burdens, it must still comply to the extent that it does not; the entity bears the burden of proof; the decision is made by the head of the public entity or their designee after considering all resources available for the funding and operation of the service, program or activity, with a written statement of reasons; and the entity must take any other action that would not cause the alteration or burden but still ensures individuals with disabilities receive the benefits or services to the maximum extent possible.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.