Where monitoring relies on public task or legitimate interests, a worker can object on grounds of their particular situation; the employer can refuse only if it demonstrates compelling legitimate grounds overriding the worker's interests (giving weight to claims of substantial damage or distress), if the processing is for legal claims, or if the objection is manifestly unfounded or excessive. If it refuses it must tell the worker, should document and explain the decision, and must tell them of their right to complain to the ICO and to seek a judicial remedy.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.