An independent body chosen to audit must be a legal person or a sole trader and must field personnel with enough knowledge for the way the assignment is designed and, when the audit calls for it, knowledge of the business being examined. The general advice tells the supervisory authority to weigh the body's own level of cybersecurity, the time and resources it can commit and any relevant certification, and to judge sufficient knowledge by its staff's competence in cybersecurity, examination methodology and security auditing.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.