PCI DSS 4.0
Req 6: Secure Systems and Software

PCI DSS 4.0 6.5.4: 6.5.4 Separate roles between production and pre-production

Roles and functions must be divided between production and pre-production environments so that accountability exists and only changes that have been reviewed and approved reach production. It applies to all entities. Applicability: where staff numbers are small and individuals hold several roles, the same aim can be met through extra procedural controls that create accountability; as an illustration, a developer could hold an elevated administrator account in development but a separate user-level account in production for developer tasks. Objective under the customized approach: job roles and accountability that distinguish pre-production work from production work are defined and managed to reduce the risk of unauthorised, unintentional or inappropriate actions.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 43 controls across 19 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 5 controls

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.3 Segregation of duties
  • 8.2 Privileged access rights
  • 8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments
  • 8.32 Change management

ISO 27701:2019 · 4 controls

  • 5.3.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
  • 6.11.2 Security in development and support processes
  • 6.6.2 User access management
  • 6.9.1 Operational procedures and responsibilities

CMMC 2.0 · 3 controls

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

  • AC-5 Separation of Duties
  • CM-5(5) Access Restrictions for Change | Privilege Limitation for Production and Operation (CM-5(5))
  • SA-10 Developer Configuration Management

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

  • AC-5 Separation of Duties
  • CM-5(5) Access Restrictions for Change | Privilege Limitation for Production and Operation (CM-5(5))
  • SA-10 Developer Configuration Management

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.3 Segregation of duties
  • 8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments
  • 8.32 Change management

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

  • CIS-16.8 Separate Production and Non-Production Systems
  • CIS-5.4 Restrict Administrator Privileges to Dedicated Administrator Accounts

NIST SP 800-218 · 2 controls

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
  • SOC2-CC8.1 CC8.1 Managing changes to procedures, software, data and infrastructure
  • ASBv3-GS-2 Define and implement enterprise segmentation/separation of duties strategy

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

  • 8.3 AI risk treatment
  • NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

  • 3.1.1e Dual Authorization for Sensitive System Operations

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Req 6: Secure Systems and Software

You are reading one control. How much of PCI DSS 4.0 have you already done?

PCI DSS 4.0 6.5.4 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 43 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.