C5 (Germany) C5-OIS-04: Segregation of Duties

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 35 controls across 23 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 4 controls

SOC2-CC1.3 CC1.3 Structures, reporting lines, authorities and responsibilities (COSO principle 3)
SOC2-CC3.3 CC3.3 Considering fraud risk (COSO principle 8)
SOC2-CC5.1 CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties

NIST SP 800-218 · 3 controls

SP800-218-PO.2.1 Roles and Responsibilities for Secure Development
SP800-218-PS.1.1 Protect All Forms of Code from Unauthorized Modification
SP800-218-PW.2.1 Qualified Review of Software Design

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC03-BP05 Define permission guardrails for your organization
SEC11-BP06 Deploy software programmatically

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-IAM-04 Separation of Duties
CCM-IAM-09 Segregation of Privileged Access Roles

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

5.2 Information security roles and responsibilities
5.3 Segregation of duties

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.2 Information security roles and responsibilities
5.3 Segregation of duties

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02 Roles, responsibilities, and authorities related to cybersecurity risk management are established, communicated, understood, and enforced
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

161R1-AC-5 Separation of Duties
161R1-CM-5 Access Restrictions for Change

NIST SP 800-172 · 2 controls

3.1.1e Dual Authorization for Sensitive System Operations
3.9.2e Insider Threat Program

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-08 Identify Each Person by Name and Separate User and Administrator Roles

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management · 1 control

CPS220-P35 Required Content of Risk Management Policies and Procedures

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

CPS234-14 Definition of Information Security Roles and Responsibilities

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-GS-2 Define and implement enterprise segmentation/separation of duties strategy

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-18 Independence of Testers

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

AC.L2-3.1.4 Separation of Duties

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.5 Governance and organisation

FedRAMP High · 1 control

AC-5 Separation of Duties

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.01.04 Separation of Duties

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-AC-5 AC-5 Separation of Duties

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

6.5.4 6.5.4 Separate roles between production and pre-production

UK Cyber Essentials · 1 control

CE-AC.5 Separate Admin Accounts for Administrative Activities

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of C5 (Germany) have you already done?

C5 (Germany) C5-OIS-04 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.

If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.178.5% covered · 26 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 572.7% covered · 33 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate71.1% covered · 35 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202267.8% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202257% covered · 52 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 350.4% covered · 60 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free