Service providers only (an additional requirement): a written description of the cryptographic architecture is kept current and covers: (1) details of every algorithm, protocol and key used to protect stored account data, with key strength and expiry date; (2) prevention of the same cryptographic keys being used in both production and test environments; (3) how each key is used; and (4) an inventory of the HSMs, the key management systems (KMS) and any other secure cryptographic devices (SCDs) supporting key management, with device type and location, to support Requirement 12.3.4. Applicability: applies only when the assessed entity is a service provider; with cloud HSMs, responsibility for the architecture is split between cloud provider and cloud customer. Objective under the customized approach: correct, current information about the cryptographic architecture is maintained and can be produced. Future-dated (bullet on preventing the same keys being used in production and test): treated as a best practice up to 31 March 2025 and mandatory since then.
This control maps to 22 controls across 14 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
PCI DSS 4.0 3.6.1.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 22 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.