FedRAMP Moderate PL-8: Security and Privacy Architectures

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 41 controls across 18 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 5 controls

1.2.3 1.2.3 Accurate network diagram of CDE connections
1.2.4 1.2.4 Accurate data-flow diagram for account data
12.1.1 12.1.1 Overall information security policy established and disseminated
12.1.2 12.1.2 Security policy reviewed annually and updated as needed
3.6.1.1 3.6.1.1 Service provider cryptographic architecture documented

SOC 2 · 5 controls

SOC2-CC3.1 CC3.1 Objectives specified clearly enough to assess risk (COSO principle 6)
SOC2-CC5.1 CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
SOC2-CC5.2 CC5.2 General controls over technology (COSO principle 11)
SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
SOC2-P6.4 P6.4 Privacy commitments from vendors and third parties

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

CIS-12.2 Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture
CIS-12.4 Establish and Maintain Architecture Diagram(s)
CIS-16.10 Apply Secure Design Principles in Application Architectures
CIS-3.8 Document Data Flows

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 4 controls

CCM-AIS-04 Secure Application Design and Development
CCM-DSP-05 Data Flow Documentation
CCM-DSP-07 Data Protection by Design and Default
CCM-IVS-08 Network Architecture Documentation

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

5.1 Policies for information security
5.35 Independent review of information security
8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles
8.32 Change management

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

5.1 Policies for information security
5.35 Independent review of information security
5.8 Information security in project management
8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

NIST800-PL-8 PL-8 Security and Privacy Architectures
NIST800-SA-17 SA-17 Developer Security and Privacy Architecture and Design
NIST800-SA-22 SA-22 Unsupported System Components

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-GS-2 Define and implement enterprise segmentation/separation of duties strategy
ASBv3-GS-4 Define and implement network security strategy

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-04 Identify the Most Sensitive Information and Servers and Maintain a Network Diagram

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-COS-07 Documentation of the network topology

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

SC.L2-3.13.2 Security Engineering

GDPR · 1 control

GDPR-Art.25 Data protection by design and by default

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-03 Representations of the organization's authorized network communication and internal and external network data flows are maintained

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-PL-8 Security and Privacy Architectures

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.16.01 Security Engineering Principles

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.11.4e Security Solution Rationale Document

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 HIGH · 1 control

PL-8 PL-8 Security and Privacy Architectures

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE · 1 control

PL-8 PL-8 Security and Privacy Architectures

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate PL-8 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free