A party to a private conversation does not knowingly use a listening device to record it unless all the principal parties consent, expressly or impliedly, or one principal party consents and the recording is either reasonably necessary to protect that party's lawful interests or not made with the aim of passing the conversation, or an account of it, to people outside it. Penalties as for s 7(1)(a). For recorded calls or meetings, the practical route is an announcement or other basis from which every principal party's consent can be shown.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.