The organization sets asset management objectives for the relevant functions and levels. In setting them it considers its present and expected internal and external context, its risks and opportunities, and the condition, performance and capability of its assets. The objectives (a) agree and line up with organizational objectives, (b) are set so as to realize value, (c) agree with the asset management policy, (d) can be measured where that is practicable, (e) reflect applicable requirements (see 4.2), (f) are monitored, (g) are communicated to relevant stakeholders, (h) are reviewed and updated when appropriate and (i) are kept as documented information.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO 55001:2024 6.2.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 55001:2024 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 55001:2014 and 27 of 38 ISO 55001:2024 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO 55001:2014 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.