The organization produces a strategic asset management plan (SAMP) setting out its strategies and approaches for taking decisions and for carrying out and aligning asset management activities. The SAMP (a) agrees with the asset management policy, (b) contains the decision-making framework and requires the value that has been defined and settled to be pursued, (c) sets the asset management objectives and how they will be met, (d) sets the process for identifying the capabilities those objectives need, (e) gives the time frames for delivering the SAMP, (f) sets out the contingencies that could affect delivery and how they will be handled, and (g) sets the approaches for improving the system, asset management and the assets. The organization keeps the SAMP in line with its financial plans and its other resource plans and explains how that alignment is achieved; the SAMP is kept as documented information and reviewed and updated from time to time.
This control maps to 3 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO 55001:2024 6.2.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 55001:2024 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 55001:2014 and 27 of 38 ISO 55001:2024 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO 55001:2014 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 3 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.