Once analysed, the results of the evaluation process, or an indicator's value, should be set against the intended results, which can be a value the organization chose, a legal or other requirement, or what a process is meant to produce; where there is no such value or requirement, the evaluation can be driven instead by a trend, by near misses, by management of change or by what workers suggest. Evaluation should also take in the whole of OH&S performance, to judge whether the results are acceptable and in line with what was intended, and whether the evaluation processes or indicators need adapting or action needs taking. Many organizations post a summary of their OH&S indicators on the intranet to promote improvement. The foundry example compares each worker's average exposure with the requirement, keeps the documented information, uses the comparison to judge whether controls are effective and whether more are needed, and feeds the findings into the OH&S improvement plan.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.