The organization must be able, at the individual's request, to supply a copy of the personal data it processes about them, in a structured and commonly used format accessible to that individual, portable and machine readable where the jurisdiction requires it, ensuring the copy relates only to that individual, informing them where the requested data has already been deleted under the retention policy, not seeking to re-identify individuals solely to satisfy this control where it can no longer identify them, and enabling direct transfer to another organization at the individual's request where technically feasible.
This control maps to 18 controls across 10 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO 27701:2019 7.3.8 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 27701:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold SOC 2 and 58 of 108 ISO 27701:2019 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 289 were rejected on the SOC 2 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 18 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.