The review considers: status of actions from earlier reviews; changes in relevant internal and external issues; how well the EOMS performs and works, with trends in learner and beneficiary satisfaction and feedback, achievement of objectives, process performance and conformity, nonconformities and corrective actions, monitoring and measurement results, audit results, external provider performance, and formative and summative assessment outcomes; adequacy of resources; effectiveness of risk and opportunity actions; opportunities for improvement; and staff feedback on competence-building activities. The 2025 text adds changes in interested parties as a separate input.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.