The prospective lead appointed party prepares, for the pre-appointment stage, a BIM execution plan for its delivery team that explains how it will work and what resources it needs to satisfy the EIR (ISO 19650-3). It considers the resources the information management function needs; when, how often and how extensively the appointing party wants exchanges; any need to federate with other lead appointed parties; and how it intends to bring in other appointed parties as task teams during the operational phase, including handing on parts of the EIR to them. The appointing party may set the format or provide templates, and the lead may add its own requirements to EIR it passes on (5.4.3).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.