Site visits shall be planned and performed as appropriate to reduce verification risk, with the need, number and locations decided on the risk assessment, the number and size of sites, the diversity of activities, the nature and magnitude of emissions per site, quantification complexity, confidence in the data management system, risks pointing to specific locations and prior results; a visit shall be performed for an initial verification, a subsequent one without knowledge of the prior activities, a change of ownership of a material site, misstatements indicating a visit, unexplained material changes, the addition of a material site, material changes in scope or boundary, or significant data management changes at the site, unless the risk assessment, evidence-gathering plan and prior results justify otherwise, in which case the rationale shall be documented; at the site the verifier shall assess, as the risk assessment determines, operations and activities, data management and control systems, physical infrastructure, measuring equipment and its calibration traceability, equipment types and supporting calculations, processes and material flows, scope and boundaries, conformity with procedures, personnel activities affecting materiality, sampling equipment and methods, monitoring practices, calculations and assumptions, and quality control and assurance procedures.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.