Guidance: the organization should understand how it interacts with the environment by identifying the environmental aspects of what it does, makes and supplies, both those under its control and those it can only influence, with a life cycle perspective (acquiring raw materials, design, production, transport, use, and treatment and disposal at end of life, weighted by the degree of control and influence at each stage), and their associated impacts, adverse and beneficial. It should consider past, current and planned activities, normal and abnormal conditions including start-up, shutdown, maintenance and reasonably foreseeable emergencies, and aspects it can influence through purchasing, external providers, product design and product use. Aspect categories include emissions to air, releases to water and land, use of raw materials, natural resources and energy, energy emitted, waste and by-products, and use of space, across design, procurement, operations, facilities, external providers, transport, product use and waste management. Impacts should be understood using an approach suited to the organization that recognises beneficial and adverse, actual and potential impacts, the environmental media affected, location characteristics and the nature of the change. Significance should be determined using established criteria relating to the aspect (type, size, frequency) and the impact (scale, severity, duration, exposure), informed by compliance obligations and interested party concerns, never chosen so as to downgrade a significant aspect, with any threshold justified. Documented information on aspects, impacts, criteria and significant aspects, including those arising in emergencies, should be maintained, reviewed periodically and updated on change, and used to determine operational controls.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.