Within the system's scope, the organization identifies the environmental aspects of what it does and of the products and services it offers, both those it controls and those it can only influence, together with the environmental impacts linked to them, taking a life cycle perspective. In doing so it takes account of change, such as planned or new developments and activities, products and services that are new or altered, and of abnormal conditions and emergencies that can reasonably be foreseen. Applying criteria it has set, it decides which aspects have, or could have, a significant impact on the environment, communicates its significant aspects across its different functions and levels where appropriate, and keeps documented information on its aspects and impacts, on the criteria for judging significance, and on which aspects are significant.
This control maps to 5 controls across 4 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 5 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.