Production and service provision, together with how they are monitored and measured, usually make up most of the plan; a contract can cover manufacture, installation and processes after delivery, and process maps or flow charts express their interrelationship. Processes may need checking for capability, always where the output cannot be verified afterwards. The plan should identify what goes in, the realization activities and what comes out, and where appropriate include or refer to process steps; documented procedures and work instructions; tools, techniques, equipment and methods with any material, product or process certification; controlled conditions and the mechanisms for determining compliance including statistical process controls; qualification or certification of personnel; criteria for workmanship or service delivery; statutory and regulatory requirements; and the codes and practices of the industry. If the product must be installed or commissioned, the plan should state how the product is installed and which characteristics are verified and validated then; where post-delivery activities are included, how conformance with statutes, industry codes, personnel competence and initial and ongoing technical support will be assured (ISO 10006 for project processes).
This control maps to 10 controls across 6 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 10 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.