For software modification the table lists impact analysis, reverification of the changed module and software configuration management (HR at every SIL), reverification of affected modules, revalidation of the complete system or regression validation, data recording and analysis, and two-way traceability linking the software safety requirements and the modification plan (with its reverification and revalidation) (R at SIL 1 and 2, HR at SIL 3 and 4).
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.