In derogation from GDPR Art. 9(1), special categories of employees' data (health, biometrics used for identification, trade union membership, religion) may be processed for employment purposes where necessary to exercise rights or meet legal obligations under labour law, social security or social protection law and nothing suggests the employee's legitimate interest in exclusion prevails. Consent to such processing follows s 26(2) and must expressly name these data. The safeguards of s 22(2) apply.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.