FedRAMP High AU-5: Response to Audit Logging Process Failures

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 25 controls across 11 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

CIS-13.1 Centralize Security Event Alerting
CIS-17.4 Establish and Maintain an Incident Response Process
CIS-8.1 Establish and Maintain an Audit Log Management Process
CIS-8.2 Collect Audit Logs

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
5.26 Response to information security incidents
8.15 Logging

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 4 controls

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-06 Information on adverse events is provided to authorized staff and tools
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04 Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
NIST-CSF-RS.CO-02 Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01 The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties once an incident is declared

PCI DSS 4.0 · 4 controls

10.2.1.6 Log initialization, stopping, or pausing of logs
10.7.1 Critical security control failure detection (SP)
10.7.2 Critical security control failure detection (all entities)
10.7.3 Failure response timeline

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
5.26 Response to information security incidents
8.15 Logging

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-OPS-17 Logging and Monitoring - Availability of the Monitoring Software

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

AU.L2-3.3.4 Audit Failure Alerting

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-LOG-13 Failures and Anomalies Reporting

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.03.04 Response to Audit Logging Process Failures

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-AU-5 Response to audit logging process failures

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC7.4 Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High AU-5 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

If you hold C5 (Germany)29% covered · 291 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free