Directive (EU) 2019/1937 applies to the reporting of infringements of this Regulation and to the protection of persons who report them. An organisation within the scope of that Directive must therefore make its internal reporting channels and procedures available for infringements of this Regulation, acknowledge and follow up such reports within the timeframes that Directive sets, preserve the confidentiality of the reporting person's identity, and protect reporting persons against retaliation on the same terms as for the other areas of Union law the Directive covers.
This control maps to 11 controls across 6 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.87 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 11 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.