Providers of high-risk AI systems placed on the Union market must report any serious incident to the market surveillance authorities of the Member State where the incident occurred. The report must be made immediately after the provider has established a causal link between the AI system and the incident, or the reasonable likelihood of such a link, and in any event no later than fifteen days after becoming aware of it. That deadline is two days in the event of a widespread infringement or an incident consisting of a serious and irreversible disruption to the management or operation of critical infrastructure, and ten days where a person has died. An initial incomplete report may be submitted where necessary to ensure timely reporting, followed by a complete report. After reporting, the provider must without delay carry out the necessary investigations including a risk assessment of the incident and corrective action, cooperate with the competent authorities and any relevant notified body, and must not carry out any investigation that alters the AI system in a way that could affect a subsequent evaluation of the causes without first informing the competent authorities.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.73 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.