Art.84 requires the Commission to designate one or more Union AI testing support structures performing the tasks listed in Art.21(6) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 in the field of AI. Art.85 gives any natural or legal person with grounds to consider this Regulation infringed the right to lodge a complaint with the relevant market surveillance authority, which handles it under its own procedures. Neither imposes a duty on a regulated party. The two operator-facing articles in the former Art.84-87 bundle are now controls in their own right: EUAI-Art.86, the deployer's duty to explain an individual decision to an affected person, and EUAI-Art.87, the application of Directive (EU) 2019/1937 to the reporting of infringements of this Regulation.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.84-87 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.