Chapter IX Section 3 sets the enforcement machinery: market surveillance and control of AI systems on the Union market (Art.74), mutual assistance and control of general-purpose AI systems (Art.75), supervision of real world testing by market surveillance authorities (Art.76), the powers of authorities protecting fundamental rights (Art.77), confidentiality (Art.78), the national procedure for AI systems presenting a risk (Art.79), the procedure for systems the provider classified as non-high-risk under Art.6(3) (Art.80), the Union safeguard procedure (Art.81), compliant AI systems that nonetheless present a risk (Art.82) and formal non-compliance (Art.83). Where these articles touch an operator they do so by way of an order a market surveillance authority issues in a particular case.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.74-83 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.