Where an authoring tool performs restructuring transformations (same technology, changed structure, such as linearising tables or splitting pages) or re-coding transformations (different encoding technology), it must keep accessibility information in the output when the output technology has equivalent mechanisms.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.