For a non-web document within the ICT, the document has to satisfy the WCAG 2.2 criteria of this group: name, role, states and values exposed and settable programmatically (10.4.1.2); status messages conveyed to assistive technology without focus (10.4.1.3). Name, role, value is restated in Table 10.21 with notification to assistive technology and accessibility features of the underlying software; 10.4.1.1 is void (parsing removed).
This control maps to 3 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 3 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.