For a non-web document within the ICT, the document has to satisfy the WCAG 2.2 criteria of this group: colour never the sole carrier of meaning (10.1.4.1); pause, stop or separate volume for audio that plays by itself beyond 3 seconds (10.1.4.2); text contrast of 4.5:1, or 3:1 for large text (10.1.4.3); text enlargeable to 200 percent without loss (10.1.4.4); real text used in place of pictures of text (10.1.4.5); reflow at a 320 CSS pixel width (256 in height for horizontal text) without scrolling both ways (10.1.4.10); 3:1 contrast for component boundaries, states and graphics needed for understanding (10.1.4.11); no loss when users widen line, paragraph, letter and word spacing (10.1.4.12); hover or focus pop-ups that can be dismissed, hovered over and stay put (10.1.4.13). Audio control, reflow (only where the viewer can present content that narrow), non-text contrast and hover content are restated in Tables 10.1 to 10.4 with document wording; text spacing applies to documents built in markup that lets users change spacing; best practice is a smallest x-height of 8 CSSpx.
This control maps to 10 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 10 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.