Footage is not special category data merely because it shows glasses or a wheelchair, but Article 9 applies once footage is processed to infer such data (political opinion from a strike or demonstration, health from monitoring a patient). A controller processing special categories through video must identify both an Article 9 exception and an Article 6 basis; vital interests could serve only exceptionally and for nothing else, and Article 9(2)(e) is not available, since walking into a camera's range does not make special category data manifestly public. Such processing calls for heightened security and a DPIA where needed.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.