FedRAMP High
CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring

FedRAMP High CA-1: Policy and Procedures

Develop and review assessment/authorization policy at least annually.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 27 controls across 18 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 6 controls

  • 1.1.1 NSC policies and procedures documented
  • 11.1.1 Testing policy documented
  • 11.1.2 Testing roles assigned
  • 12.1.1 An overall information security policy is: • Established. • Published. • Maintained. • Disseminated to all relevant personnel, as well as to relevant vendors and business partners
  • 12.1.2 The information security policy is: • Reviewed at least once every 12 months. • Updated as needed to reflect changes to business objectives or risks to the environment
  • 2.1.1 All security policies and operational procedures that are identified in Requirement 2 are: • Documented. • Kept up to date. • In use. • Known to all affected parties

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-CC3.4 COSO principle 9: Identifies and assesses changes that could impact internal controls
  • SOC2-CC4.1 COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations
  • SOC2-CC4.2 COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner
  • SOC2-CC5.3 COSO principle 12: Deploys control activities through policies and procedures

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.1 Policies for information security
  • 5.37 Documented operating procedures

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

  • CPS234-19 Information Security Policy Framework
  • ASBv3-GS-5 Define and implement security posture management strategy

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-COM-02 Policy for planning and conducting audits
  • CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

DORA · 1 control

  • DORA-Art.24 General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.1 Policies for information security

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

  • 9.2.2 Internal audit programme
  • NIST-CSF-GV.PO-02 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced to reflect changes in requirements, threats, technology, and organizational mission
  • NIST800-CA-1 Policy and procedures for assessment, authorization, and monitoring
  • 53A-3.2.6 Finalize the Assessment Plan and Obtain Approval

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High CA-1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 27 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.