An implementation plan is approved by the relevant parties and addresses converting systems and data, the criteria for acceptance testing, communication, training, preparing the release, moving it to production, support in early live running, a fallback or backout plan and a review after implementation: the plan sets out the implementation strategy, the order of steps, resources needed, interdependencies, the criteria on which management will accept the live implementation, what must be verified at installation, the transition strategy and the post-implementation review; external solution providers commit to their part in each step; fallback and recovery processes are identified and recorded; technical and business stakeholders approve the plans, with internal audit reviewing them where suitable; and the technical and business risks of implementation are formally reviewed and the key ones addressed in planning.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.