A quality assurance plan consistent with the quality management system is prepared, resourced and carried out so that the solution reaches the quality set in its requirements and in the quality policies and procedures of the enterprise: the plan and practices set out quality criteria, the processes for validation and verification, how quality will be reviewed, what qualifications reviewers need, and who is responsible for what; quality is checked often against project requirements, enterprise policies, compliance with the development methodology, quality procedures and acceptance criteria; techniques such as code inspection, test-driven development, continuous integration, automated tests, walk-throughs and testing of applications are applied as fits, and their results are reported; and quality exceptions are monitored and corrective actions dealt with, records are kept of reviews, results, exceptions and corrections, and reviews are repeated where needed.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.