FedRAMP High RA-9: Criticality Analysis. Identify critical system components and functions by performing a criticality analysis for [Assignment: organization-defined systems, system components, or system services] at [Assignment: organization-defined decision points in the system development life cycle]

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 26 controls across 18 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 4 controls

SOC2-CC3.2 COSO principle 7: Identifies risks and analyzes to determine how managed
SOC2-CC5.1 COSO principle 10: Selects and develops control activities to mitigate risks
SOC2-CC6.1 Implements logical access security software, infrastructure and architectures over protected information assets
SOC2-CC9.1 Identifies, selects and develops risk mitigation activities

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 3 controls

NIST-CSF-GV.OC-04 Critical objectives, capabilities, and services that external stakeholders depend on or expect from the organization are understood and communicated
NIST-CSF-GV.OC-05 Outcomes, capabilities, and services that the organization depends on are understood and communicated
NIST-CSF-ID.AM-05 Assets are prioritized based on classification, criticality, resources, and impact on the mission

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management · 2 controls

CPS230-17 Mandatory Minimum Classification of Critical Operations
CPS230-P27 Comprehensive Assessment of the Operational Risk Profile

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-RA-9 Criticality analysis
SP800-53-RA Risk Assessment Family

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-04 Identify the Most Sensitive Information and Servers and Maintain a Network Diagram

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

CPS234-20 Information Asset Classification

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-IR-5 Detection and analysis - prioritize incidents

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-BCM-02 Business impact analysis policies and instructions

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-23 Resources Sufficient to Fulfil Obligations

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-BCR-02 Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.8 Identification

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(7)(ii)(E) Applications and Data Criticality Analysis (Addressable)

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-RA-9 Criticality Analysis

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(7)(ii)(E) Applications and Data Criticality Analysis (Addressable)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

12.5.1 Inventory of system components in scope

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High RA-9 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

If you hold C5 (Germany)29% covered · 291 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free