FedRAMP High
RA - Risk Assessment

FedRAMP High RA-9: Criticality Analysis (RA-9)

Criticality Analysis. Identify critical system components and functions by performing a criticality analysis for [Assignment: organization-defined systems, system components, or system services] at [Assignment: organization-defined decision points in the system development life cycle]

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 28 controls across 20 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-CC3.2 CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
  • SOC2-CC5.1 CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
  • SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
  • SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption
  • NIST-CSF-GV.OC-04 Critical objectives, capabilities, and services that external stakeholders depend on or expect from the organization are understood and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-GV.OC-05 Outcomes, capabilities, and services that the organization depends on are understood and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-ID.AM-05 Assets are prioritized based on classification, criticality, resources, and impact on the mission
  • CPS230-17 Mandatory Minimum Classification of Critical Operations
  • CPS230-P27 Comprehensive Assessment of the Operational Risk Profile

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
  • 5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

  • NIST800-RA-9 RA-9 Criticality Analysis
  • SP800-53-RA Risk Assessment Family
  • ANSSI-HYG-04 Identify the Most Sensitive Information and Servers and Maintain a Network Diagram

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

  • ASBv3-IR-5 Detection and analysis - prioritize incidents

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-BCM-02 Business impact analysis policies and instructions
  • CFTC-SS-23 Resources Sufficient to Fulfil Obligations

DORA · 1 control

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

  • 8.2.2 Business impact analysis

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets
  • RA-9 RA-9 Criticality Analysis
  • RA-9 RA-9 Criticality Analysis

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 12.5.1 12.5.1 Inventory of in-scope system components

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in RA - Risk Assessment

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High RA-9 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 28 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.