FedRAMP Moderate
RA - Risk Assessment

FedRAMP Moderate RA-9: Criticality Analysis. Identify critical system components and functions by performing a criticality analysis for [Assignment: organization-defined systems, system components, or system services] at [Assignment: organization-defined decision points in the system development life cycle]

Criticality Analysis. Identify critical system components and functions by performing a criticality analysis for [Assignment: organization-defined systems, system components, or system services] at [Assignment: organization-defined decision points in the system development life cycle]

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 26 controls across 18 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-CC3.2 COSO principle 7: Identifies risks and analyzes to determine how managed
  • SOC2-CC5.1 COSO principle 10: Selects and develops control activities to mitigate risks
  • SOC2-CC6.1 Implements logical access security software, infrastructure and architectures over protected information assets
  • SOC2-CC9.1 Identifies, selects and develops risk mitigation activities

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 3 controls

  • NIST-CSF-GV.OC-04 Critical objectives, capabilities, and services that external stakeholders depend on or expect from the organization are understood and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-GV.OC-05 Outcomes, capabilities, and services that the organization depends on are understood and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-ID.AM-05 Assets are prioritized based on classification, criticality, resources, and impact on the mission

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management · 2 controls

  • CPS230-17 Mandatory Minimum Classification of Critical Operations
  • CPS230-P27 Comprehensive Assessment of the Operational Risk Profile

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
  • 5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

  • ANSSI-HYG-04 Identify the Most Sensitive Information and Servers and Maintain a Network Diagram

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

  • ASBv3-IR-5 Detection and analysis - prioritize incidents

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-BCM-02 Business impact analysis policies and instructions

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

  • CFTC-SS-23 Resources Sufficient to Fulfil Obligations

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

DORA · 1 control

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

  • 8.2.2 Business impact analysis

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.9 Inventory of information and other associated assets

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 12.5.1 Inventory of system components in scope

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in RA - Risk Assessment

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate RA-9 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gapsIf you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gapsIf you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gapsIf you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gapsIf you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gapsIf you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 eachBrowse the graph free

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 26 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpointAll FedRAMP Moderate controls