A business must not deny goods or services, charge different prices, provide a different quality, or suggest any of these because a consumer exercised a CCPA right, and must not retaliate against employees, applicants or contractors who do so. A difference is lawful only if it reasonably reflects what the consumer's data is worth to the business; denials permitted by law and differences required by other law are not discrimination (11 CCR 7080).
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
CCPA/CPRA 1798.125(a) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CCPA/CPRA your existing evidence covers. Hold GDPR and 17 of 89 CCPA/CPRA controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the GDPR pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.