A business may not sell or share data about a consumer it knows (or wilfully ignores) is under 16 unless the consumer, if 13 to 15, or a parent or guardian, if under 13, has affirmatively authorised it. Under 11 CCR 7070 and 7071 the business must document a reasonable parental-consent method for under-13s and an opt-in process for 13 to 15 year olds, tell them of the continuing right to opt out, and describe these processes in its privacy policy (7072).
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
CCPA/CPRA 1798.120(c) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CCPA/CPRA your existing evidence covers. Hold GDPR and 17 of 89 CCPA/CPRA controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the GDPR pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.