The team building the AVMO ought to show that it can detect and properly handle: safety-related vehicle faults that a driver of a comparable human-driven vehicle could reasonably notice; safety-related faults in the AVMO itself; and every other safety-related vehicle fault. Self-check data from the AVSO, AVPO and AVCO ought to feed this monitoring. Faults a driver would notice may be caught by the AVMO directly or by the other operations and passed on; examples given are collision damage found in a car park, an odd noise from a wheel bearing, and an engine that starts stalling near junctions.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.