The assessment system makes assessment fair and appropriate and enables accurate judgements of competency. It must deliver assessment that meets the four principles: fairness (the student's needs are accommodated, reasonable adjustments made where appropriate and reassessment available where needed); flexibility (assessment suits the context, product and student, and credits relevant skills and knowledge however and wherever acquired); validity (assessment includes practical application so the student demonstrates the skills and knowledge in a practical setting); and reliability (evidence is interpreted consistently and outcomes are comparable whichever assessor assesses). Assessors justify each judgement against the four rules of evidence: validity (evidence is adequate to be reasonably assured the student has the skills and knowledge), sufficiency (quality, quantity and relevance permit an informed judgement), authenticity (the evidence is the student's own genuine work) and currency (the evidence shows current skills and knowledge).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.