Planned internal audits tell the organization whether its QMS meets its own requirements (which under 9100 should take in customer QMS requirements and statutory and regulatory ones that apply) and those of the standard, and whether the system is working in practice and being kept up; performance indicators can be assessed during audits. The organization plans, sets up, runs and maintains an audit programme that weighs how important processes are, what has changed and what earlier audits found; sets criteria and scope for each audit; picks auditors so that audits are objective and impartial; reports findings to the managers concerned; corrects problems and takes corrective action promptly; and keeps documented information as evidence.
This control maps to 8 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 8 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.