APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System
CBPR Program Requirements: Collection Limitation

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-PR-06: Collection limited to relevant information

The applicant limits collection to information relevant to the purposes for which it is collected or to other compatible or related purposes.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 11 controls across 7 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • AUCDR-PS-2 Privacy Safeguard 2 - Anonymity and pseudonymity
  • AUCDR-PS-3 Privacy Safeguard 3 - Seeking to collect CDR data from CDR participants
  • AUCDR-PS-4 Privacy Safeguard 4 - Dealing with unsolicited CDR data

ISO 27701:2019 · 2 controls

  • 7.4.1 Limit collection
  • 7.4.4 PII minimization objectives

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-P3.1 P3.1 Collecting personal information consistent with objectives
  • SOC2-P7.1 P7.1 Quality of personal information

APPI · 1 control

  • APPI-A18 Restriction on Handling Beyond the Purpose of Use
  • APP-3 APP 3 - Collection of solicited personal information

CCPA/CPRA · 1 control

  • CCR §7060 Consumer Identity Verification

GDPR · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CBPR Program Requirements: Collection Limitation

You are reading one control. How much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System have you already done?

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-PR-06 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System your existing evidence covers. Hold GDPR and 43 of 59 APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the GDPR pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 11 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.