APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System
CBPR Program Requirements: Collection Limitation

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-PR-07: Lawful and fair collection

The applicant collects personal information by lawful and fair means consistent with the requirements of the jurisdiction governing the collection.

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 8 controls across 8 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

APPI · 1 control

  • APPI-A20 Proper Acquisition and Special Care Required Personal Information
  • AUCDR-PS-3 Privacy Safeguard 3 - Seeking to collect CDR data from CDR participants
  • MYHR-CUD-2 Prohibition on unauthorised collection, use and disclosure
  • APP-3 APP 3 - Collection of solicited personal information

GDPR · 1 control

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • 7.2.2 Identify lawful basis
  • NIST800-PT-2 Authority to Process Personally Identifiable Information. Determine and document the [organization-defined] that permits the [organization-defined] of personally identifiable information; and Restrict the [organization-defined] of personally identifiable information to only that which is authorized

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-P3.1 Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CBPR Program Requirements: Collection Limitation

You are reading one control. How much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System have you already done?

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-PR-07 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System your existing evidence covers. Hold GDPR and 43 of 59 APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the GDPR pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 8 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.