APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System
CBPR Program Requirements: Notice

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-PR-03: Purposes stated at collection

The applicant states at the time of collection the purposes for which the personal information is being collected.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 11 controls across 8 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

APPI · 2 controls

  • APPI-A17 Specification of the Purpose of Use
  • APPI-A21 Notice or Public Announcement of the Purpose of Use

CCPA/CPRA · 2 controls

GDPR · 2 controls

  • GDPR-Art.13 Information to be provided where personal data are collected
  • GDPR-Art.14 Information where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject
  • AUCDR-PS-5 Privacy Safeguard 5 - Notifying of the collection of CDR data
  • APP-5 APP 5 - Notification of the collection of personal information

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • 7.2.1 Identify and document purpose
  • NIST800-PT-3 PT-3 Personally Identifiable Information Processing Purposes

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-P1.1 P1.1 Privacy notice to data subjects

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CBPR Program Requirements: Notice

You are reading one control. How much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System have you already done?

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System CBPR-PR-03 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System your existing evidence covers. Hold GDPR and 43 of 59 APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the GDPR pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 11 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.