The draft plan should follow good practice and its planning assumptions should be tested before it is finalized, starting with an internal validation workshop with a tabletop exercise. The program should: review with team members the roles and responsibilities, training requirements, testing of notification and communication systems, crisis communications and other topics such as staging areas, legal points and continuity, having sent the plan out beforehand; validate assumptions in a tabletop exercise in a relaxed setting that helps members see how to approach the event, how to communicate with one another, who coordinates with police, fire, EMS and top management, what actions protect lives and assets, where the plan is strong or weak, and that fosters mutual understanding across departments; once validated internally, run a further tabletop with local police, fire and EMS so they understand the plan and their protocols are built in for rapid access and joint working; and capture lessons and improvements throughout. Scenarios can include media and stakeholder communications, counseling, follow-up care and continuity.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.