NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 57.5% of CIS Controls v8
88 of the 153 controls in CIS Controls v8 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. 65 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of CIS Controls v8 your NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
463 candidate mappings were examined and 289 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
CM-8 requires a documented, current inventory of system components with the attributes CIS asks for.
SI-3 requires deploying and maintaining malicious code protection mechanisms.
SI-3 requires updating malicious code protection mechanisms as new releases become available.
SI-3 requires scanning files from external sources as they are opened or transferred.
SI-16 requires memory protection mechanisms against unauthorized code execution.
CP-9 requires backups of user and system information supporting recovery.
CP-9 requires backups at defined frequencies consistent with recovery objectives.
CP-4 requires testing the contingency plan to determine effectiveness of restoration.
Claims that did not hold
268 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.
Not corroborated on review of this pair by Claude Code
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
Not corroborated on review of this pair by Claude Code
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
Not corroborated on review of this pair by Claude Code
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Not corroborated on review of this pair by Claude Code
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
Not corroborated on review of this pair by Claude Code
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Not corroborated on review of this pair by Claude Code
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
Not corroborated on review of this pair by Claude Code
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Not corroborated on review of this pair by Claude Code
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk