NIST SP 800-172NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1

NIST SP 800-172 covers 21.5% of NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1

41 of the 191 controls in NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for NIST SP 800-172. 150 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

21.5%
of the target already covered
41
controls evidenced
150
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 your NIST SP 800-172 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

80 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

C-SCRM Family: System and Information Integrity5 of 8 evidenced, 3 to do
C-SCRM Family: Risk Assessment4 of 7 evidenced, 3 to do
C-SCRM Family: System and Communications Protection6 of 14 evidenced, 8 to do
C-SCRM Family: Identification and Authentication3 of 7 evidenced, 4 to do
C-SCRM Family: Supply Chain Risk Management4 of 13 evidenced, 9 to do
C-SCRM Family: Configuration Management4 of 14 evidenced, 10 to do
C-SCRM Family: Planning2 of 7 evidenced, 5 to do
C-SCRM Family: Awareness and Training1 of 4 evidenced, 3 to do
C-SCRM Family: Personnel Security1 of 4 evidenced, 3 to do
C-SCRM Family: Incident Response2 of 9 evidenced, 7 to do
C-SCRM Family: Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring1 of 6 evidenced, 5 to do
C-SCRM Family: Access Control2 of 14 evidenced, 12 to do
C-SCRM Family: Program Management4 of 30 evidenced, 26 to do
C-SCRM Family: Audit and Accountability1 of 9 evidenced, 8 to do
C-SCRM Family: System and Services Acquisition1 of 15 evidenced, 14 to do
C-SCRM Family: Contingency Planning0 of 8 evidenced, 8 to do
C-SCRM Family: Maintenance0 of 8 evidenced, 8 to do
C-SCRM Family: Media Protection0 of 4 evidenced, 4 to do
C-SCRM Family: Physical and Environmental Protection0 of 9 evidenced, 9 to do
C-SCRM Family: Personally Identifiable Information Processing and Transparency0 of 1 evidenced, 1 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

3.1.3eAC-4argued against and upheld
Information Flow Enforcement

Secure information transfer solutions control information flows between security domains on connected systems.

3.1.1eAC-5argued against and upheld
Separation of Duties

Dual authorization splits execution of critical or sensitive operations between two parties.

3.2.1eAT-2argued against and upheld
Literacy Training and Awareness

Awareness training expressly covers social engineering, advanced persistent threat and supply chain attacks.

3.14.2eAU-6argued against and upheld
Audit Review, Analysis, and Reporting

Ongoing monitoring with advanced detection reviews activity for anomalous or suspicious behaviour.

3.11.6eCA-7argued against and upheld
Continuous Monitoring

Supply chain risk treated as a continuing cycle of identification, response and ongoing monitoring.

3.4.1eCM-10argued against and upheld
Software Usage Restrictions

Authoritative source and repository governs which software components are approved and vetted for use.

3.4.1eCM-11argued against and upheld
User-Installed Software

Only software drawn from the trusted authoritative repository may be installed on systems.

3.14.5eCM-12argued against and upheld
Information Location

Persistent storage locations reviewed at defined frequency, which identifies where information actually sits.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk