NIST SP 800-172Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

NIST SP 800-172 covers 14.7% of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

29 of the 197 controls in Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for NIST SP 800-172. 168 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

14.7%
of the target already covered
29
controls evidenced
168
genuine gaps
6
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 your NIST SP 800-172 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

57 candidate mappings were examined and 6 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

CCC - Change Control & Configuration Management3 of 9 evidenced, 6 to do
STA - Supply Chain Management, Transparency & Accountability4 of 14 evidenced, 10 to do
SEF - Security Incident Management, E-Discovery & Cloud Forensics2 of 8 evidenced, 6 to do
HRS - Human Resources Security3 of 13 evidenced, 10 to do
IVS - Infrastructure & Virtualization Security2 of 9 evidenced, 7 to do
UEM - Universal Endpoint Management3 of 14 evidenced, 11 to do
TVM - Threat & Vulnerability Management2 of 10 evidenced, 8 to do
IAM - Identity & Access Management3 of 16 evidenced, 13 to do
DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management3 of 19 evidenced, 16 to do
LOG - Logging & Monitoring2 of 13 evidenced, 11 to do
AIS - Application & Interface Security1 of 7 evidenced, 6 to do
GRC - Governance, Risk & Compliance1 of 8 evidenced, 7 to do
A&A - Audit & Assurance0 of 6 evidenced, 6 to do
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience0 of 11 evidenced, 11 to do
CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management0 of 21 evidenced, 21 to do
DCS - Datacenter Security0 of 15 evidenced, 15 to do
IPY - Interoperability & Portability0 of 4 evidenced, 4 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

3.14.7eCCM-AIS-05argued against and upheld
Automated Application Security Testing

Verifying correctness of security critical software by review, analysis, testing or evaluation is pre-release security testing.

3.4.2eCCM-CCC-04argued against and upheld
Unauthorized Change Protection

Detecting unauthorized components then removing or quarantining them protects against unauthorized change.

3.4.2eCCM-CCC-07argued against and upheld
Detection of Baseline Deviation

Automated detection of misconfigured components with remediation is proactive baseline deviation detection.

3.14.4eCCM-CCC-09argued against and upheld
Change Restoration

Refreshing components from a known trusted state restores the last known good configuration.

3.14.5eCCM-DSP-02argued against and upheld
Secure Disposal

Removing CUI no longer needed from persistent storage is secure disposal of data.

3.1.3eCCM-DSP-10argued against and upheld
Sensitive Data Transfer

Secure information transfer solutions govern sensitive data moving between connected security domains.

3.14.5eCCM-DSP-16argued against and upheld
Data Retention and Deletion

Periodic review of storage removing data no longer needed is retention and deletion in practice.

3.11.1eCCM-GRC-02argued against and upheld
Risk Management Program

A threat intelligence informed risk assessment guiding solution selection and monitoring is the risk management programme in practice.

Claims that did not hold

6 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.

3.13.2eCCM-AIS-04
Secure Application Design and Development

control identity corrected 2026-08-19: issued 3.13.2e is introducing unpredictability into operations; these mappings are least privilege and secure engineering, a subject that appears nowhere in the issued 800-172

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

3.13.2eCCM-IAM-05
Least Privilege

control identity corrected 2026-08-19: issued 3.13.2e is introducing unpredictability into operations; these mappings are least privilege and secure engineering, a subject that appears nowhere in the issued 800-172

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

3.5.3eCCM-IAM-14
Strong Authentication

corrected 2026-08-19: judged from a title claiming multifactor authentication, while the control carried 3.5.2e password-management text. Issued 800-172 3.5.3e is comply-to-connect: prohibit connection of unknown or unverified components. Authentication evidence does not satisfy it.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

3.13.1eCCM-IVS-03
Network Security

control identity corrected 2026-08-19: issued 3.13.1e is component diversity to limit malicious code propagation; these mappings are boundary protection and segmentation, judged against 3.1.3e's content which this control was wrongly carrying

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

3.13.1eCCM-IVS-05
Production and Non-Production Environments

control identity corrected 2026-08-19: issued 3.13.1e is component diversity to limit malicious code propagation; these mappings are boundary protection and segmentation, judged against 3.1.3e's content which this control was wrongly carrying

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

3.13.1eCCM-IVS-06
Segmentation and Segregation

control identity corrected 2026-08-19: issued 3.13.1e is component diversity to limit malicious code propagation; these mappings are boundary protection and segmentation, judged against 3.1.3e's content which this control was wrongly carrying

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk