NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3UK Cyber Essentials

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 covers 75% of UK Cyber Essentials

27 of the 36 controls in UK Cyber Essentials are already satisfied by evidence you collected for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 9 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

75%
of the target already covered
27
controls evidenced
9
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of UK Cyber Essentials your NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

45 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Malware Protection4 of 4 evidenced
Scope3 of 3 evidenced
User Access Control7 of 8 evidenced, 1 to do
Firewalls5 of 7 evidenced, 2 to do
Security Update Management3 of 5 evidenced, 2 to do
Secure Configuration5 of 9 evidenced, 4 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

03.01.01CE-AC.1argued against and upheld
User Account Approval Process

Account management defines establishment, membership conditions and authorisation before access.

03.05.01CE-AC.2argued against and upheld
Authenticate Users Before Granting Access

Uniquely identify and authenticate every system user before access is granted.

03.09.02CE-AC.3argued against and upheld
Remove or Disable Accounts When No Longer Required

On termination or transfer, disable access and revoke authenticators and credentials.

03.01.06CE-AC.4argued against and upheld
Privileged Account Approval and Tracking

Privileged accounts are restricted to designated personnel, which is controlled granting.

03.01.06CE-AC.5argued against and upheld
Separate Admin Accounts for Administrative Activities

Requires non-privileged accounts for non-security functions, separating routine from admin use.

03.01.05CE-AC.6argued against and upheld
Periodic Review of Privileged Access

Review privileges periodically and reassign or remove those no longer necessary.

03.05.03CE-AC.7argued against and upheld
MFA for Administrative Accounts

Multi-factor authentication is required for access to privileged accounts.

03.13.01CE-FW.1argued against and upheld
Boundary Firewalls Deployed

Boundary protection connects to external networks only through managed interfaces.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk