NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1ISO 27001:2022

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 covers 35.5% of ISO 27001:2022

33 of the 93 controls in ISO 27001:2022 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. 60 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

35.5%
of the target already covered
33
controls evidenced
60
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of ISO 27001:2022 your NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

132 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Technological controls13 of 34 evidenced, 21 to do
Organizational controls14 of 37 evidenced, 23 to do
Physical controls4 of 14 evidenced, 10 to do
People controls2 of 8 evidenced, 6 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

SC-85.14argued against and upheld
Information transfer

Protects transmission confidentiality and integrity for information moving outside.

MP-55.14argued against and upheld
Information transfer

Media transport protection for information moving physically between parties.

CA-35.14argued against and upheld
Information transfer

Governs the connections and exchanges between the organization and external parties.

AC-215.14argued against and upheld
Information transfer

Governs what information is shared, with whom, and under what handling conditions.

SR-65.19argued against and upheld
Information security in supplier relationships

Supplier assessments and reviews at a depth matched to what each supplies.

SR-35.19argued against and upheld
Information security in supplier relationships

Establishes the processes that identify and address supplier risk, coordinated with suppliers.

SR-25.19argued against and upheld
Information security in supplier relationships

Documented supply chain risk management plan for the system and its suppliers.

SA-95.19argued against and upheld
Information security in supplier relationships

Governs external service providers across their lifecycle and allocates security roles.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk